The most common educational advice in my timeline the last 16 months has been “give grace” – to our kids, and to ourselves as we navigated the heretofore uncharted waters of teaching and learning during a pandemic.
We didn’t get trained for this in Teacher School. (Although for veterans we’ve had plenty of tech integration opportunities over the last handful of years – I’m thankful for that and for my online PLN who got me ready to face this moment).
I have a tendency to be my own harshest critic, so it helps to get another set of eyes on my work. I got valuable help from my instructional coaches and feedback from my evaluators, but I waver back and forth in my own mind between “I was actually not that bad, all things considered” and “OMG I was awful”.
Want a reality check? Ask the kids. Like they said in the book Relentless Pursuit, they are “raw and real”. No sugar-coating.
So during our short week following final exams, I rolled out Mr. Vaudrey‘s Teacher Report Card. (Link to make your own copy here). Time for my students to grade me, anonymously.
I’ve been using the TRC for a few years now. Finally wrote about it after our fully remote first semester. For our second semester we were fully remote for the third quarter, then hybrid the rest of the way with about 20% of my students in person. So I didn’t really know what to expect in terms of student feedback. About 75 of my 125 or so completed the form. Of that group about a dozen were in-person learners.
And we saw what anecdotally was happening with a lot of my online teacher connects. By late April everyone was baked. Many of my students had kind of checked out. And I think that is kind of reflected in the responses.
So what do the numbers tell me? On a scale of 1 (not at all) to 5 (oh definitely) my students told me I’m strong in:
- “respects each student” (4.83)
- “does a good job of treating all students the same” (4.75)
- “keeps the class under control without being too tough” (4.72)
- “seems to enjoy teaching” (4.70)
- “says his words clearly” (4.70)
- “dresses professionally (4.64)
- “provides time for review of material” (4.63)
- “gives tests that reflect the material in the unit” (4.61)
- “grades fairly” (4.59)
- “pays the same amount of attention to remote learners as in-person learners” (4.57)
So I felt pretty good about those categories. And they were pretty consistent with the marks in those categories during first semester. I tried really hard to make sure I was giving the same instruction and the same support to my in-person students and to my kids on the Google Meet. To the point where one student’s reply to an open-ended question on the TRC “sometimes the teacher _____, but not always” was “leaves“. As in, I stepped away from my chromebook to assist students at their desks in my class.
OK, now the bad news:
- “has interesting lessons” (3.84)
- “has a great sense of humor” (4.05)
- “makes me feel important” (4.16)
- “encourages different opinions” (4.17)
- “tries new teaching methods” (4.22)
- “has a good pace (not too fast or too slow)” (4.29)
Those were also pretty consistent with my first semester feedback, although “has interesting lessons” was down by almost a quarter point (-0.22).
So what do I take away? The bar is set pretty high for “interesting lessons” during the second semester of Algebra II. It’s super-abstract and theoretical, and many of my students don’t see the real-life connection for say, graphing polynomial functions. But it’s my job to hook them in. My last few years of in-person Algebra II I’ve replaced many of the traditional tests with activities or projects, which was mostly pretty well received. I tried to use some of the same tools during remote learning, with wildly mixed results. Without the ability to sit down face-to-face with students, many found the projects too confusing to try. The NCAA bracket probability activity and an exponential growth/decay project was also a dud.
I wish I could have found a way to build in more support, especially for my remote learners, during those projects.
One of my online connects asked a very valid question: how do these results compare to results from a semester of in-person teaching? And unfortunately that was at a different district and I didn’t have the foresight to send a copy of the result to my personal Drive. So I don’t have a good baseline to work off of.
Part of the beauty of the Teacher Report Card is it is customizeable. When you click the link it is set up as a “force copy” then you can add or delete any questions you like. I added:
- “What is one thing from remote learning during the pandemic that you want teachers and schools to keep doing once we are back in person?”
- “What is one thing from remote learning during the pandemic that you hope we never do ever again once we are back in person?”
And my students told me what they wanted to keep:
- “Keep the break time”
- “No uniforms”
- “Keep Advisory period”
- “Give us the option to learn from home instead of in person”
- “Friday e-learning days”
- “Let us learn at our own pace”
- “Makeup work for full credit”
- “Being patient with assignments”
A lot of kids appreciated the ability to get caught up on work, they appreciated asynchronous Fridays when they could roll out of bed whenever and do work. They appreciated the district built in SEL content during Advisory and that many teachers built in check-in questions for their students at least once a week.
The e-learning Fridays are off the table. The district is going away from uniforms this year to study the results of the program which lasted for about 15 years. But Advisory and SEL will return in August. And I’m interested to see how many teachers are going to be willing to make “amnesty days” or give students an opportunity to make up work from previous weeks.
But what do they want to go away?
- “Online assignments”
- “Google Meets”
- “Being stuck in the house 24/7”
- “Remote learning”
- “Tests with cameras on”
- “I never want to log on to a Google Meet ever again”
- “300 hundred assignments per week”
- “Breakout rooms”
- “Desmos assignments”
That last one breaks my heart. I was a little afraid of that. I’ve always made sure to mix up my tools in the classroom because even the great stuff gets old if you use it too much. Desmos activities are a fabulous tool for online learning, and I used them for all my assessments, but I could tell by the end that students were weary of “click the link for your class period and sign in with Google.”
I’m hopeful we are back fully in person in August. I’ll still lean pretty heavily on Desmos. My new school is moving to a New Tech model and critical thinking is baked in the cake. Desmos is one way for me to ask questions and create tasks that have my students thinking critically on the daily. Breakout rooms were a poor substitute for group work but it was the best we could do during remote/hybrid. Assuming physical distancing requirements are relaxed, I expect to be having kids seated in pods just like in the Before Times. (Collaboration is also a hallmark of New Tech learning).
Some of the other things on the students’ wish list are above my pay grade to determine. But it’s worth taking some time this summer to think about what my class, and my classes, will look like in August.
I loved the five-minute break. I loved having many of my lesson presentaions built in Quizizz so we did notes and guided practice all rolled into one. I love my hyperdoc/slide activities. One of my colleagues lent me the latest EduProtocols book (devoted exclusively to math) and that will continue to be a staple. I love Desmos activities (I already floated a trial balloon with the department chair at my new school to see who the Desmos people are over there, and if anybody would be interested in collaborating on building activities. And maybe, just maybe, finally learning CL). The retreival practice/summary/exit ticket in a Google Form is here to stay too I think. My students did ask for a little more time to complete that activity tho. I can do that.
One of my new colleagues has already reached out to the Geometry team to think about planning together for the summer. We’ve got a group text set up and are talking about a Google Doc that we can use to brainstorm together.
I have a list of my own questions that I’m rolling around in my head that I dumped into the planning doc for us all to knock around:
- How do we approach “learning loss” from 15 months of pandemic teaching? Do we feel like that’s even a thing? Should we start by creating a list of topics that we could not address due to time constraints? Do we build in a “jump start” day to every unit to spiral back to those skills as they are needed? Make every bellringer a spiral review for that day’s topic? Lots of ways I’m hearing my online teacher connects suggesting they might use.
- How do we use our 80 minute blocks? At the combined department meeting in May (our principal) indicated there would be days we would have to plan to cover two topics in the same block. Blended learning? An in-class flip? Stations? Flexible grouping based on student need for that day? Paper or MathXL?
- However we split up the 80, we’re still at a deficit in terms of time – 200 minutes of classtime per week under the 4×4 block vs. 250 minutes in a traditional schedule. What is the most efficient use of that time so that we cover our standards and have time for Exact Path/ISTEP/PSAT/finals review/final exams?
- From talking with (Morton’s DC), Morton was already on 4×4 block so that’s mostly a learning curve for teachers coming from Gavit.
- New Tech will work its way up to us, but do we want to start creating some type of project-based or cross-curricular component to each unit? How do we create those and who do we collaborate with?
- What kind of tools is everyone using for notes presentation and in-class activities and formative assessments? Desmos, Geogebra, Pear Deck, EdPuzzle, hyperdocs, EduProtocols, GSlides, Quizizz, GoFormative, Socrative, mini whiteboards, 360 math, 3-Act math, anything I’m missing?
- Common assessments or no?
That should be enough to keep me busy for the next 8 weeks or so. And I’m hopeful that my students’ input makes me better at what I do every day. I’m thankful that they took the time to make their voices heard.
P.S. Another beautiful side effect of the Teacher Report Card is you get a handful of entries for your “I Had A Bad Day” file. So when I’m sure I suck at this job I can open up this post and remind myself of a time when I didn’t suck:
- “You’ve been an amazing teacher, I appreciate you so much, you really made me enjoy math.”
- “Ill miss this class even though i hate math lol”
- “I want to say thank you for helping me understand math a lot this year, especially since we were online the whole year. I now get some math terms a little more, and understand some equations better.”
- “Nothing else, you did a great job teaching me and my peers this semester. Thanks!”
- “I think you’re a great teacher, you explain the topic well and get your point across.”
- “I appreciate all that you have done to teach us Algebra 2, I am sure I will use some of the math I learned here in my future job. Thank you for being patient with all of us! You are definitely one of my better teachers that I’ve had in a while. Have a great summer!”
- “I really enjoyed this class. I appreciate how you tried to interact with us either with jokes or class discussions.”
- “Thank you for trying your best with me. I hope you have a good summer.”
- “I like how much effort is put in from the teacher into the lessons even if we don’t say much.”
- “I really liked the quizzes notes because they were really helpful.”
- “He teaches at my pace I never had a math teacher where my grade stayed the same throughout the year”
- “For this class I have cool teacher who helps in the best way possible.”
So I’m gonna sit with those for a while over the summertime too.