When I applied for the Indiana Teach Plus Policy Fellowship last spring I really had no belief that I would actually be selected for the position. And then, upon my selection, I had no idea what I was really getting into.
I knew I would be be reading and researching and writing and meeting with policymakers/legislators and advocating for positions in the education space, but what did that really mean?
Our state legislature is in the second half of its session, when the 1500 or so bills in the two chambers have been whittled down to a more manageable number for debate and consideration and all the groups that advocate at the Statehouse can start to narrow their focus.
It’s the time when my executive director is gently nudging us to write op-ed pieces on the topics we’ve been researching. And if not writing 800-word thinkpieces, at least crafting testimony before the House or Senate Education Committees. I’m a good 2.5 hour drive from the state capital and I’m not sure I can sneak away this week for an in-person testimony, so the written word will have to suffice.
So here I am. Following a virtual meeting of my Equitable Funding Advocacy work group tonight, I crafted a first draft of written testimony on the biennial budget bill, in particular focusing on the proposed expansion of my state’s voucher program (known as the “Choice Scholarship Program”) to families making 400% of the threshhold for free/reduced price lunch.
Here we go:
Steve Dull
Senate Education Committee
Written Testimony
HB 1001
Voucher Expansion
My name is Steve Dull and I am a math teacher at Oliver P. Morton High School in Hammond, and an Indiana Teach Plus Policy Fellow. I am the parent of two graduates of Indiana public high schools, one of whom followed my path of attending a Catholic grade school until eighth grade.
I have taught students in urban and suburban districts, in Las Vegas as well as in Indiana. I have served as a member of my Parish Pastoral Council. I appreciate the opportunity to submit testimony in regards to the Choice Scholarship Program.
Catholic schools have a long history in our country of serving the most marginalized students: European immigrants in the 19th century to children of color experiencing poverty in the late 20th century. And within the last two decades leaders in the state of Indiana have seen fit to make public funds available to families who wish to offer their children a Catholic education but struggle to pay the tuition required to attend parish schools.
I can relate: for a few years while my wife and a partner were attempting to launch a non-profit matching middle school girls with STEM industry mentors, we provided for our family of four on a public school teacher’s salary. And yes, we made use of our diocesan tuition support program (funded by collections in parishes across Lake, Porter, LaPorte, and Starke counties) in those years. My oldest son, now a United States Army MP, qualified for reduced price lunch and the 21st Century Scholars program.
If we agree the Choice Scholarship Program is an appropriate use of public funds, can we also agree that a means test is appropriate to determine who should be eligible to use public funds to attend private schools?
The Indiana Constitution requires that the state provide, “by law, for a general and uniform system of Common Schools, wherein tuition shall be without charge, and equally open to all”.
So we have a conflict. The desire to provide school choice, especially to our most marginalized families, with our constitutional mandate to provide a uniform system of schooling, free and open to all.
Opening the Choice Scholarship to families making up to 400% of the federal poverty level is a move we cannot afford to make. That is an annual income of $200,000 per year, or more than three times the median household income in our state.
Only 4.5% of Indiana families exceed this income threshold yet we are willing to take dollars away from the schools serving 19 of every 20 Hoosier children to provide scholarship money to the top 5 percent of earning families in our state. My school serves a population that is 85% historically marginalized and 74% economically disadvantaged. Our teachers and staff are rock stars and bring their A Game every day but serving a population in economic need requires support, and that requires funding.
The Indiana Capital Chronicle notes that “After the expansion, the program would cost the state an estimated $500 million in fiscal year 2024, and another $600 million in the following fiscal year.” This is more than double the current outlay for the Choice Scholarship program.
There is no magic pile of money in Crown Point, or Indianapolis, or Washington. This expansion of the Choice Scholarship is excessive. We can provide school choice to our families in need, especially our families of color, without taking funds away from the schools that serve our families in need who opt for a public education.
I’m hopeful my senior policy fellow and my executive director will provide gentle yet incisive suggestions for edits.
And since the written testimony should be around 450 words or two spoken minutes and an op-ed is targeted at 750-800 words, I may have a publishable piece when my colleagues are done with it. I’d love to do more than just shout into the wind.
More importantly, I hope I am able to contribute to the conversation around how public education is funded (and valued) in my state.
Wish me luck. Wish us all luck.